Objectification and belittling of Sibyl Vane in Oscar Wilde’s Novel The Picture of Dorian Gray

Authors

  • Inam Ullah Khan M. Phil Scholar, Department of English, Kohat University of Science & Technology (KUST),Kohat, KP, Pakistan
  • Dr. Syed Sabih-Ul-Hassan Assistant Professor, Department of English, Kohat University of Science & Technology (KUST), Kohat, KP, Pakistan
  • Dr. Said Imran Assistant Professor, Department of English, Kohat University of Science & Technology (KUST),Kohat, KP, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-I)17

Keywords:

Autonomy, Belittled, Feminism, Ill-Treatment, Objectification, Subjectivity

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to locate elements of feminism in Oscar Wild’s novel ‘The Picture of Dorian Gray’. It is argued that the male characters are the main focus of the story, while the female characters are treated as supporting characters. Through their gaze and words, the male characters objectify and denigrate the female characters. Females are regarded as nothing more than pretty faces for pleasure-seeking. Elements of objectification are highlighted in the novel by employing the theory of objectification. An in-depth examination of the novel through the lens of objectification theory reveals the shocking reality of male characters treating female characters, particularly Sibyl Vane, as objects. It is concluded that men in the novel treat women brutally. They are either regarded as fools or empty pots. They are treated as something that can be bought, sold, and replaced rather than as a human being with autonomy and subjectivity. Furthermore, other studies could be conducted on the same while applying different linguistic approaches such as pragmatics, critical discourse analysis (CDA) etc.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-18

Details

    Abstract Views: 1080
    PDF Downloads: 1200

How to Cite

Khan, I. U., Hassan, S. S. U., & Imran, S. (2023). Objectification and belittling of Sibyl Vane in Oscar Wilde’s Novel The Picture of Dorian Gray. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(1), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-I)17